Iran’s generals and clerics have repeatedly shown a reluctance to go to war in recent months, yet the scale of Israel’s damage to the country’s regional prowess left them with little option but to retaliate.
The assassination of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah last week dealt a crushing blow to Iran’s decades-in-the-making network of armed allies, the most powerful of which is the Lebanon-based group, designated a terrorist organization by the US and other countries. His death in an Israeli airstrike came either side of days of intense bombing, followed by a ground incursion early Monday.
Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s initial response to Nasrallah’s death was that Hezbollah would lead retaliatory efforts, alongside Lebanon. That left many Shiite Muslims in the Middle East and in Iran frustrated at the lack of action.
“There was a lot of public opinion and pressure on Iran to do something,” said Foad Izadi, professor of world studies at the University of Tehran.
Left with little room to maneuver, Iran then fired about 200 ballistic missiles at Israel on Tuesday night, an assault similar in nature to the salvo that followed the bombing of its consulate in Damascus in April. That attack was broadly seen as deliberately measured and was thwarted by Israel, the US and other allies. This week’s barrage was also mostly intercepted, though Iran gave less warning and more missiles breached Israeli airspace.
“Israel has demonstrated escalation dominance and intelligence infiltration, including in Iran,” said Gerard DiPippo, senior geo-economics analyst at Bloomberg Economics. “Tehran might want to avoid the mistake of Hezbollah, which thought it was managing the intensity of the war, only to be surprised by an Israeli escalation.”
Iran’s caution followed a lack of significant response to the assassination of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran in July, a killing widely suspected to have been carried out by Israel, though it didn’t claim responsibility. The US and others have been seeking to secure a cease-fire in the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza for months without success.
Ahmed Al-Heela, a Palestinian expert on Iran’s so-called axis of resistance — the name given to a network militia groups sponsored by Tehran — said: “Israel messed with Iran’s national security” when it killed Nasrallah and went after Hezbollah.
“There is an organic and structural connection between the IRGC and Hezbollah,” he told Al Jazeera’s Arabic-language news channel, referring to Tehran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. He added that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s talk of redrawing the map of the Middle East and pushing back Iran’s influence in the Levant spurred the leadership of the Islamic Republic into action.
Tuesday night’s strike is unlikely to be enough to restore Khamenei’s reputation. It caused little significant damage and has received a mixed response from the Middle East’s minority Shiite Muslim population that he aspires to lead.
Ali Mourad, a law professor at the Beirut Arab University and a native of the Shiite-dominated Lebanese south, said celebratory gunfire echoed in Beirut for almost 30 minutes after Iran’s barrage. That speaks to pockets of support for Hezbollah, he said by phone, even with the group on the back foot.
Nasrallah was seen as close to Khamenei, putting the supreme leader’s reputation at stake and placing more pressure on him to act.
“People feel orphaned, Nasrallah was a source of their strength,” Mourad said. “They are blaming Iran and don’t understand its intentions and the battle trajectory.”
With assistance from Gina Turner.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
